Cheaper Solar Energy

Gerbilnow encourages and supports enterprises that contribute to the well-being, health and happiness of all.
Information, entertainment and fun are essential ingredients.

Follow Askgerbil on Twitter 

Cutting the cost of solar energy

Friday, 15/04/2011

Staff Writer: Colin Dunstan
Author of: Cyclic Heat to Work Conversion Systems: Elegant Simplicity and Beauty in Mathematics (Read more...)



The Kogan Creek Solar Boost facility is to be an auxiliary component of a coal-fired power station.
(Solar base-load power stations on the way - Huge solar power project approved for southern Queensland)


The investment is planned to produce 44,000 megawatt-hours per year to supply power to 5,000 homes. That is 8,500 kWh per home each year.
 
To do this with solar photovoltaic ("PV") panels would require a 5,000 kW solar PV system for each home, plus storage for night and cloudy days. A 5,000 kW solar PV system might produce 8,500 kWh in a year - but only on sunny days and will produce no energy at night.
 
The Kogan Creek Solar Boost facility shares the steam turbine generator of the coal-fired power station and as a result does not require any costly storage mechanism for 24-hour 7-day per week uninterrupted energy supply.
 
This is a very good example of an innovation aimed at reducing the cost per kWh of solar energy that is converted into a usable energy resource.

Solar Thermal Installations

Abengoa Solar PS10

Large fields of flat mirrors ("heliostats") that track the sun and reflect sunlight onto a single receiver for power generation have been constructed. The Abengoa Solar PS10 solar field that is composed of 624 heliostats is one example.
(Abengoa Solar PS10)
Abengoa Solar

The large flat mirrors need to be spaced so that they do not obstruct reflected sunlight beams from mirrors further away from the receiver. To get enough mirrors close enough to deliver a reasonable total amount of solar energy, the receiver is mounted on a tall, expensive "solar tower".
 
The Abengoa Solar PS10 field illustrates a number of limitations that contribute to the cost of this approach. Compare it to the planned  Kogan Creek Solar Boost facility;
  • The Abengoa Solar project includes the capital cost of a steam turbine generator - and this expensive capital equipment is idle every night and on cloudy days.
  • Flat mirrors need to be larger than the area of solar energy they can reflect onto a "solar tower". Each 1 metre x 1 metre square beam of sunlight needs a mirror about 1 metre x 1.4 metres if it is deflected by 90 degrees.
 

Ivanpah Solar Power

In the same week that the Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced in Australia the Kogan Creek Solar Boost facility, Google announced it will invest $168 million in the 370-megawatt (MW) project which relies on solar thermal technology that's sometimes informally called the “power tower”
(The Ivanpah solar power plant)
Ivanpah Solar

Flat mirrors also are limited because the sunlight they reflect spreads out the further it travels to the "solar tower". As a result there is a practical limit on how much solar thermal energy can be supplied, no matter how much capital investment has been made in the "solar tower" and turbine generator. The cost per kWh produced cannot easily be reduced because of these restrictions that are an inherent part of the design.
 

Newcastle Solar Thermal Field

In 2010 construction began on a new solar thermal field, tower and research facility at CSIRO’s National Solar Energy Centre in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Funded by a Commonwealth Government initiative - the Australian Solar Institute (ASI), this project is part of a A$5 million collaboration between the CSIRO Energy Transformed Flagship and the Australian National University (ANU).
(CSIRO's National Solar Energy Centre)
CSIRO Solar Field

Concentrated Solar Power to Gasify Biomass

An idea aimed at further cost reductions is to use solar thermal energy from a Solar Boost facility to gasify biomass. If this was configured as part of a coal-fired power station like the Kogan Creek Solar Boost facility there would be 2 further cost benefits:

  • The solar energy being used to generate power in the power station would be obtained from both the solar reflectors and the solar energy embodied in the biomass. The result is that a greater percentage of the power station's energy production would be renewable solar energy.
  • Biomass often contains a surplus of water. When solar thermal energy is used to gasify biomass some is wasted converting this surplus moisture content into nothing but water vapour. The addition of small amounts of coal to the biomass could avoid this energy loss; The excess water in the biomass plus the added coal could be converted to syngas by the solar thermal energy.

SUNgas: Thermochemical gasification of biomass using concentrated solar energy

The goal of this project is to develop and advance technology for the sustainable production of synthesis gas via solar thermochemical gasification of cellulosic biomass and carbonaceous waste materials. Coupling concentrated solar energy with thermochemical conversion of non-food biomass and waste products promises a new path for the production of alternative fuels as well as storage and transport of solar energy. The solar production reduces greenhouse gas emissions—even compared to other biofuels—without requiring carbon capture and sequestration. The process stores solar energy as an easily convertible and transportable fuel.

biomass energy yield
The solar technology has dramatic advantages over conventional gasification processes. The yield of fuel per acre of cropland is doubled, and the product gas is clean—uncontaminated by the byproducts of combustion. ...read more at
the University of Minnesota website
 

 

Pursuing Further Cost Reductions

Another idea that may help to further reduce the cost per kWh of solar energy that is converted into a usable energy resource is to replace the flat mirrors that are used in solar thermal fields with concentrating parabolic reflectors to create compact solar energy beams that are directed at a central receiver.
Solar Concentrator
One design objective is to minimize the number of components needed.
With parabolic concentrators, small beams directed towards a single target do not need a tall "solar tower". 
Each parabolic concentrator points directly at the sun, so a 1 metre x 1 metre square beam of sunlight needs a mirror only 1 metre x 1 metre area of mirror. The result is a more cost-effective mirror.
A small concentrated beam will still spread out the further it travels but will fit within the same size target window of a large flat mirror from a considerably greater distance.
 
This short animation of the design shows that over a 12 hour period each concentrating parabolic reflector produces a vertical collimated beam along the vertical axis of rotation of the large parabolic dish.

The angle of vertical deflection is constrained between +/- 45 degrees with some careful thought on the choice of direction of the small parabolic dish.
The foci of the large and small parabolic dishes have to coincide but their axes do not need to be parallel to one another.

Optical system for creating high-intensity solar light beam

United States Patent 4183612
Inventor: Taucher, Kenneth F. (7069 Hoover Dr., Mentor, OH, 44060)

Briefly, an objective parabolic mirror gathers and focuses solar radiation to form a solar image. Light from the solar image is passed through an input collimating lens and becomes collimated due to image and miror spacing. Since the solar image is not a point but has a finite diameter, the collimated light will diverge after passing through this second lens into diverging collimated light bundles which are received by a fresnel-like reflector located at a given distance from the input collimating lens.

This reflector, having multiple flat, annular surfaces, bounces back the collimated light bundles in such a way that they no longer diverge but instead become parallel to the system optical axis. The now parallel collimated bundles strike a parabolic reflector after which they converge to a theoretical point image at the focus of the parabolic reflector where a reflector pinhole aperture mask filters out erroneous light caused by aberations, misalignment, and other errors. The pinhole mask preferably is highly reflective to minimize heat build-up from the concentrated light. The filtered light, still high in intensity, passes out of the pinhole and begins to diverge. An output collimating lens, preferably placed close to the pinhole, intercepts these diverging rays and collimates them into an intense, parallel light bundle.

The several optical elements may be replaced by one or more functionally equivalent elements. For example, the fresnel-like reflector may be replaced by a fresnel-like lens and/or the parabolic reflector by a functionally equivalent lens. These and the other lenses may be replaced by functionally equivalent lenses, reflectors or combinations thereof.
 

 
For questions or comments about this site, contact:
info@gerbilnow.com
 
Page Modified May 20, 2011